Please note that all these articles are just linked from other websites. I don't own or write any of them. Moreover, this blog is being under construction, so some functions might not work properly. Be patient!!! :)

Showing posts with label Amazon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Amazon. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Amazon Cloud Player: First Impressions

Amazon has made its triumphant entry into the music streaming world with Amazon Cloud Player. Rather than stream a library of predetermined music (e.g. Pandora, Spotify), Cloud Player lets you upload your existing music library and stream it from any computer or Android device.

For the last 30 minutes, I’ve been testing out Cloud Player. While it’s impossible to get the full experience in half an hour (mostly because Amazon estimates it will be another 12 hours before my first 1,262 songs are uploaded), I’ve had enough time to play with it to write a preliminary evaluation of Amazon’s new streaming music service.

Here are some of my initial thoughts about Amazon Cloud Player and its companion Android app:
  • Uploading: When you first install Cloud Drive on your computer, it searches your entire hard drive for your music and your playlists. While this takes a while (10 minutes), once the process is complete, it makes uploading songs a snap. It pulled my iTunes playlists and let me choose which ones I wanted to upload, a very welcomed feature.
  • Usability: The web-based cloud player is really intuitive. The layout makes it easy to select songs, search your music archives and organize your music. The player itself is quick to load, responsive, and even lets you skip around to different points in your music, something not possible with most of the streaming music players on the market today.
  • Music Quality: While I’m no audiophile, I really can’t tell any difference between Cloud Player and a streaming service like Pandora. Playing music from your hard drive is going to give you a better acoustic experience, but the vast majority of consumers won’t be able to tell the difference.
  • Features: Cloud Player doesn’t have a lot of frills, but you will be able to do almost everything you want within it. It doesn’t have iTunes’ ability to automatically download podcasts or Genius recommendation feature, but they’re not necessary features for a great music experience.
  • Android: I also took Amazon’s Cloud Player app for spin on a Motorola Atrix 4G phone. After signing in with my Amazon account, it quickly found my uploaded music and played it flawlessly. Again, I was able to skip around to different points in my music, create playlists and search my Cloud Drive for uploaded music. The player even lets you access your on-device music, essentially rendering Google’s official Music player useless.
  • Price: You start with 5 GB of free storage, but for the vast majority of people, that won’t be enough. Without a second thought, I upgraded to 20 GB for $20/year, though in retrospect I should’ve bought a cheap album instead. The pricing plan is very simple: 1 GB per dollar. I paid more for Pandora One ($36)than I did for 20 GB of Cloud Player storage, so overall I’d say Amazon’s giving everybody a good deal.
Even from my short test, it became apparent that Amazon wasn’t launching some half-baked product; Cloud Player is a fully-functional, very usable streaming music player that could even make iTunes obsolete for many people, and its ability to play on-device and cloud-based music could quickly make it Android’s killer app.

Amazon has thrown down the gauntlet and set a high bar for cloud-based music streaming. Apple and Google, which are expected to launch their own cloud players sometime this year, will have to match Amazon on usability and price if they’re going to compete.

Amazon can’t rest on its laurels though; Apple will surely harness its control of iPhone, iTunes and iOS to boost its own offering and give the shopping giant a run for its money.
[via mashable]

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

RedLaser Now Scans QR Codes


Popular barcode-scanning, comparison shopping iPhone app RedLaser has just been updated with support for QR code scanning.
eBay-owned RedLaser released the new version of the application earlier this morning, also piping in eBay and Half.com listings for product barcode scans — a nice bonus of the June acquisition.
RedLaser [iTunes link] has already been downloaded more than 5 million times, making it perhaps the most mainstream user-friendly barcode scanning app on the market. Now that RedLaser possesses QR code scanning capabilities there’s no need for app users to download a separate application or go elsewhere for their QR scanning needs.
Plus, more than 100 application makers have used the RedLaser SDK to integrate barcode scanning functionality into their application experience. That SDK is also getting a makeover, courtesy of eBay, to allow for even more options like VIN barcode scanning and gift card scanning.
We think QR codes are on the verge of becoming a breakout trend in the U.S. In 2010, we’ve already seen a number of creative QR code marketing campaigns, brand initiatives and paper product replacements. With QR code support, RedLaser will play conduit between brand and consumer even more so than before.
Image courtesy of clevercupcakes, Flickr

[via mashable]

Sunday, October 3, 2010

Amazon and Pampers Bring Diaper Shopping to Facebook


As individuals spend more and more time on Facebook, big brands looking to leverage that time are integrating more features and services into their Fan Pages.
Proctor & Gamble just launched a new e-commerce tab on its Pampers Fan Page, offering consumers a way to shop for diapers without ever leaving the site.
We’ll admit that we have a hard time feigning enthusiasm for online diaper shopping — on or off FacebookFacebook — but the technology that powers the new Pampers web store has potential.

Proctor & Gamble partnered with Amazon and used its recently revamped WebStore e-commerce platform to power the Facebook app. That means that item selection, descriptions, reviews and checkout options are all handled by Amazon.com. The only real differences between a Facebook app and a standard Amazon WebStore implementation is that the Pampers store takes place inside the fan page.
Pampers is the first P&G brand to use e-commerce within its fan page, but the company’s press release indicates that it looks forward to rolling the capabilities out to other P&G brands in the future.
TechFlash asked Amazon spokeswoman Tracy Ogden about future plans for WebStore integration with Facebook, and while the company didn’t comment, citing its policy of not discussing future plans, this is definitely a feature that fits into the rest of the Amazon WebStore and Amazon Marketplace Web Serviceecosystem.
Pampers may be the first example of an Amazon-powered web store on Facebook, but it’s hardly the first e-commerce example. At the beginning of the summer, Disney rolled out an app on its Toy Story 3 fan page that allowed users to buy movie tickets and invite friends to various screenings. Sony Pictures Entertainment has also integrated movie ticket purchase options into the Fan Pages for some of its films, including Eat Pray Loveand Resident Evil Afterlife.
Likewise, other e-commerce platforms like ShopTab, Payvment and BigCommerce offer their own shopping solutions for businesses and brands.
Still, Amazon remains a major player in the e-commerce and fulfillment space. Many businesses build either their own custom Amazon WebStores or use Amazon for fulfillment or payment processing.
If the P&G fan page is indicative of a future product vertical, and we think it is, this could mean big things not just for bringing e-commerce to Facebook, but for expanding the reach of Amazon WebStores.
What do you think of brands integrating web stores with Facebook?

[via mashable]